The primary objective of this, the 18th edition of the UK Housing Review (initially called the Housing Finance Review), remains simply
to draw together key current financial and related data about both public and private housing in the United Kingdom, and rapidly assemble them in a coherent
and accessible format.
To that end, the Review draws on a wide range of Expenditure Plans and Departmental Reports, as well as statistical volumes, survey reports, and
other more occasional research reports. The Review also includes several tables constructed from databases that are not routinely published elsewhere.
The structure of the Review, and the sparse text, aim above all to provide a swift guide to that data, with detailed analysis confined to the Section
1: Contemporary issues chapters at the beginningof the Review (print version only). This
year three of those chapters look across the boundaries of the UK in the context of the 10th anniversary of the 1999 devolution settlement.
While one chapter focuses specifically on the postdevolution developments in housing policy, the differences in national approaches is also
highlighted in the chapters on stock transfers and council housing finances. The devolution theme is also picked up in Commentary
Chapters 4, 5 and 6 to complement the discussions in the Contemporary issues chapters. Given the significance of the credit crunch, the
Review also includes an article examining developments and prospects in the private housing market.
The six chapters of Section 2: Commentary offer a brief introduction and discussion of the key developments iin policy,
financial provision and output, that are reflected in the tables and figures in the main Compendium of tables. They also
provide a reference to other publications and data that provide further useful insights into current policy issues.
A longer perspective
Many of the tables in the Review provide data over a long time period. Wherever possible those tables start in 1970, providing data at five year intervals
for the years to 1990, with annual data for more recent years. The precise range of the years covered varies slightly from table to table, depending both on
data availability, and the practicality of setting out data on a single page. Even with its landscape format there are limits to the number of years’ data
that the Review can fit on to a single page.
Readers can consult earlier editions of the Review for data for the individual years between 1981 and 1989 that are no longer published in the current edition.
However, readers should exercise care as in some cases data for those earlier years may have subsequently been subject to revisions, primarily as a result of
changes in definitions. A cross-check of the data for those years still published in the current edition of the Review will generally indicate whether or not
this is an issue.
The Review contains several tables providing data for the regions of England. Many of those tables provide data for the long-established standard statistical
regions. Government statistics are, however, now being published primarily on the basis of government office regions. This presents difficulties in providing a
consistent long run of regional data. In this period of transition, wherever possible, current data for standard regions has been sought, in order to provide a
consistent data series. This has not, however, always been possible. Equally, long back series of data for government office regions are not always available.
In some cases, therefore, the Review includes recent data for government office regions, together with earlier data for standard regions. This is clearly
iindicated in the tables concerned.
There has also been a recent change in the nomenclature of government office regions. The Eastern region is now known as the East of England,
and Yorkshire and Humberside is now known as Yorkshire and The Humber. In this year’s Review the government office regions are generally
shown under their new names. However, the new names are not always used in our source documents or datasets, and we have followed the practice in the
latest editions of our sources, rather than impose a uniform usage.
The North West government office region now includes Merseyside, and in many cases separate figures for Merseyside are no longer available.
However, where Merseyside figures continue to be available these continue to be provided in the Review.
Over the course of time government departments are restructured or simply change their name. Thus, over the years of the Review’s publication
the department responsible for housing policy in England has evolved from the Department of the Environment, through the Department for Environment,
Transport and the Regions, and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, to now be simply, Communities and Local Government.
Where data series have been made available continuously over that period, the reference given for that data in the tables of the Review is the current
form and name of the responsible department. Where, however, reference is made to historical data, the reference will be to the form and name of the
responsible department at the time the data was initially published, or otherwise made available to the Review.
The UK Housing Review website update
An interim update to the tables in this year’s edition of the Review will be available on the website in the Spring of 2010.
Comments and suggestions
Finally the editor would welcome any comments or suggestions on the current and future format and contents of the Review, and he can be contacted by
email, phone or letter.
Professor Steve Wilcox
Centre for Housing Policy
University of York
York YO10 5DD
Telephone: 01823 323891